Guest Editorial

BY LARRY KLAYMAN | MARCH 13, 2013

Bookmark and Share

Obama provokes "race war"

LARRY KLAYMANOver the last four years since he was fraudulently elected president – Barack Hussein Obama is not a natural born citizen eligible to be president of the United States – he has increasingly shown his real colors. Claiming at the outset of his 2008 presidential election campaign that he is a Christian, it has become apparent that his real allegiance to god is to Allah, and indeed he has worn a ring for over 30 years which proclaims his sole allegiance to this Muslim "deity." Obama's ties to Black Muslim leaders and other anti-Semitic racists, such as so called Reverands Louis Farrakhan of the Nation of Islam and Jeremiah Wright, have also shown his hand, notwithstanding his having endorsed the building of a mosque at Ground Zero, his support of radical Islamist groups such as the Muslim Brotherhood in the Middle East, and his well documented hostility toward Israel and its Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. It is thus clear that Obama considers himself a true Muslim in the mold of his late Kenyan father of the same name. All of this has caused an ever increasing number of Jews and Christians to see the "president" as anti-Semitic and anti-Christian, a reality which I also firmly believe to be true.
But Obama's scorn goes far wider than just the religion and ethnicity of Jews and Christians. Particularly apparent since his last fraudulent election to the Office of the President in 2012, it has also become crystal clear that he simply hates people of the white race, even though he is one half white himself. During the campaign he constantly berated Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney as the nominee of the rich, vowing to make the rich pay their fair share in taxes and other socio-economic forms of "reparations" during his second term. And, in just the last few months since his reelection, Obama and his Democrat enablers and lackeys in Congress have moved arrogantly and aggressively to make good on his promise – and he has done so with a vengeance. Obama's constant derogatory references to the "rich" are mostly just a "politically correct" euphanism for "whitey," just as attacks by anti-Semites, of which Obama is also one, frequently are leveled against Israel, in order to mask their hatred of the true target, Jews themselves. In short, making "whitey" pay his "fair share" has become a constant drum beat of Obama and his "white slaves" in The White House, like his embarrassing boy press secretary Jay Carney. 

Put Obama's Muslim identification, his anti-Semitism and his pounding of rich whites together and you have a certified, and highly dangerous Black Muslim in The White House – ala (pun intended) Malcolm X, Elijah Mohammed and Louis Farrakhan.

That whites have come to believe that Obama truly hates them is becoming apparent even in the mainstream media. During a recent broadcast of Fox News' "The Five," former President George W. Bush's press secretary Dana Perino, a Washington establishment figure if their ever was one (she was appointed to the Board of Directors of government owned Voice of America), stated clearly that she believes that Obama does not like people like her. Bill O'Reilly has expressed similar sentiments of late, referring to Obama's dislike of "traditional Americans." While O'Reilly's comment was also racist and offensive (since what qualifies as a "traditional American" other than a white person?), it underscores how Obama is increasingly stoking and provoking anger among whites with his attacks on them, economically and socially. This media backlash against Obama's attacks on whites has not stopped with political commentators on Fox News, but has now extended to even the likes of the well respected liberal investigative journalist Bob Woodward.

Woodward is of course the most famous and respected investigative reporter in American history. As a young reporter for The Washington Post he, and his partner Carl Bernstein, uncovered the infamous Watergate scandal during the Nixon administration – leading to the president's resignation from office. He then, at The Washington Post, went on to become a leading editor and source of fair and honest reporting in other venues. Indeed, after I triggered the Chinagate scandal at Judicial Watch in the late 1990s involving Bill and Hillary Clinton and their administration, Woodward was among the first to join the hunt and investigated and had published front page stories about this scandal which rivaled in seriousness "his" Watergate scandal. At Woodward's request, yours truly – a staunch conservative and major adversary to the Clintons – even met secretly with him at the time in a dark area of Billy Martin's Tavern in Georgetown (near Woodward 's townhouse), as he wanted to know what "we had" on the Clintons and their illegal dealings with communist China, which had been lining Bonnie's and Clyde's 1996 reelection campaign coffers with bribes. In short, Woodward, while left of political center, is an honest and fair man, a real professional who investigates and reports the news with minimum bias, particularly in today's world of extreme partisanship in the media.

This explains why Woodward has been among the first of liberal journalists to call it like it is and "out" Obama and his White House for threatening him over his reporting of the on-going "sequester" crisis – which Woodward revealed was the brainchild of the president. Other white journalists on the left then followed suit and revealed that they too had been threatened over even their infrequent criticism of Obama. While one can argue that this backlash against Obama was "on the merits" of the looming sequester disaster, the very fact that the left is now coming forward to challenge Obama, shows that much more in play here. Like Dana Perino, I believe even these liberal reporters have come to see that Obama does not like them and fear his latent racism toward whites, which they likely have come to deeply resent. As has been Obama's mantra, the sequester debate has been couched by the president and his minions as an economic disaster that would hurt lower and middle income persons many of whom are black or of mixed race, at the expense of the rich. This is why Obama now wants to use his presidential leverage to negotiate a deal with Republicans to again raise taxes on the rich – in effect to again make whitey pay his fair share of "reparations" to blacks.

It is very sad and frightening that Obama has provoked this burgeoning race war. The nation, divided unlike any time since the Civil War, is about to explode in anger – primarily pitting black against white and vice versa.

For an interview with Mr. Klayman, contact 352 274 9359 or email [email protected].  See also www.freedomwatchusa.org.