Challenging decisions

As a resident and voter in Carefree, I think it is important to consider the implications of our votes for the candidates who have volunteered to serve as members of the Town Council. Carefree has been well-managed and its resources have been carefully stewarded. Nonetheless, the town faces some challenging decisions. During this year’s budget deliberations, a detailed projection of expenditures and revenues was discussed.

The analysis was based on what were described as “optimistic” assumptions. It was not presented as a forecast of the future. All projections are based on assumptions and the future is unknown. The longer the time frame considered in each projection, the more likely it is to be subject to uncertainty. One way to plan in the face of uncertainty is to consider two projections – one with optimistic assumptions and a second with pessimistic assumptions. This is a common practice in strategic planning in the private sector. For Carefree, factors that might lead to a “pessimistic” projection could include: an economic downturn (national or local); a change in state law (e.g., the removal of food from being subject to a sales tax); the departure of a major retailor; an expenditure due to a natural disaster (fire protection, road repairs), etc. One of the responsibilities of the new Town Council will be to consider the possibility of such risks in the short and in the long term and to develop plans – and funds – to address them should one of these events occur. The current Council recognizes that the three broad categories of goals set forth in the current draft of the General Plan – scenic community character, open space and environmental stewardship, prosperity and fiscal stability – can be in conflict.

The Town Council members are all volunteers and Carefree has been blessed with seven dedicated, diligent residents who each bring considerable experience to their roles on the Council. They have addressed the difficult issues of the past few years. As a result, the town is a wonderful place to live.

The two incumbents who are running again have earned re-election. The third seat should be filled by the candidate who will do the work needed to understand the issues, appreciate the views of the residents, and make the difficult choices among what can be conflicting goals. A new member with this same dedication will ensure that we have a Town Council that maintains our special town in the future.

Sharon P. Smith
Carefree