BY ROBERT ROMANO | JUNE 12, 2013

Special counsel needed in IRS case

Bookmark and Share

A special counsel needs to be appointed by Attorney General Eric Holder in the growing Internal Revenue Service (IRS) scandal, Americans for Limited Government (ALG) President Nathan Mehrens says.

Federal law provides that a special prosecutor may be appointed by the Attorney General in certain scandals under "extraordinary circumstances."

"This is an extraordinary case of political viewpoint discrimination by the agency. To assure the American people that politics will not interfere with the outcome of the investigation, an independent, special prosecutor is required," Mehrens declared in a statement.

A recent Quinnipiac University poll found that an overwhelming 76 percent of voters favor a special prosecutor being appointed in the IRS scandal, including 63 percent of Democrats.

"Voters apparently don't like the idea of Attorney General Eric Holder investigating the matter himself," said Peter Brown, assistant director of the Quinnipiac University Polling Institute according to USA Today.

Mehrens' call for a special counsel came in response to new testimony by an IRS employee stating "Washington, D.C., wanted some cases" on the tea party.

The new testimony contradicted initial claims made by former IRS Commissioner Steven Miller to congressional investigators that the scandal had been originated by two "rogue" officials at the Cincinnati office.

The employee called the two "rogue" agents explanation "impossible," explaining, "As an agent we are controlled by many, many people. We have to submit many, many reports.  So the chance of two agents being rogue and doing things like that could never happen."

The original claim that two "rogue" agents in Cincinnati had taken it upon themselves to target tea party groups was also contradicted by IRS rules requiring the Determinations Unit in Cincinnati to send certain applications identified by the Exempt Organizations (EO) Technical office based in Washington, D.C. for special scrutiny.

The criteria in IRS revenue procedures used in 2010 for identifying special cases reads: "EO Determinations will refer those applications that have been specifically reserved by revenue procedure or by other official Service instructions for handling by EO Technical for purposes of establishing uniformity or centralized control of designated categories of cases."

It now appears, based on the testimony of the IRS employees, that the tea party and other cases were specifically reserved "by other official Service instructions for handling by EO Technical."

Keep reading.

readers love sonoran news