Keep the “Care” in Carefree

After a  40 year career starting as an engineer for DuPont  and ultimately president  of  an engineering firm,  my wife and I knew that we were retiring  to Arizona. We wound up purchasing a home in beautiful Carefree, which was probably in part due to the allure of the town’s name.  However, living in  Carefree never meant that we  didn’t  ‘need to care’.  The upcoming August election is an excellent example.  We need to be informed on the candidates running and the issues. On this, I must say that I am extremely disappointed and  dismayed at Proposition  472 which would reduce the reliability of  our water system as well as Prop 473 calling for term limits which would  ban people from ever serving again after four years, including a retroactive provision for terms served prior to this year’s election. Prop 474 is the best compromise, calling for staggered term limits (half the council elected every two years), ensuring that we keep important and historical knowledge on Town Council.

As an executive whose responsibility was to make the best possible decisions on a range of corporate and technical  issues,  I placed a premium on working with proven, experienced people.  So, when I look at the incumbents who,  in addition to their time and devotion in serving the Town of Carefree, have a wealth of experience as a CFO (Mike Johnson),   a mechanical engineer/ MBA and  instructor in  finance at the college graduate level (Hatcher), a  problem solver of water infrastructure projects for 40 years (Geiger),  a regional executive of a life insurance firm (D’Aliesio), a marketing and communications  business person (Kroyer)  and then add  a retired Director of Municipal Bonds at a world-caliber investment firm (Amoroso), how does their experience  compare to the slate running against these people? That slate consists of only one person with any time on Town Council, another who is an  airline pilot,  a married couple (watch it….they are running with different last names….do you think we can get  two separate and independent votes from them?)  and lastly,  an insurance broker.  I cannot for the life of me see what this slate brings to the table. To add to that, while the one mayoral candidate challenger  has been vocal in his criticism of the present Town Council, I have not seen any proposals from him.   

The  best way to show  your ‘care for Carefree’ is to click on the link  and read  the  responses to the same list of questions asked to each candidate.  Before you do, recognize that while you will see answers from every one that I feel deserves our vote (Crane, Johnson, Hatcher, Geiger,  D’Aliesio,  Kroyer and Amoroso) you will find a response from  only one  on the slate of challengers.  Judge for yourself which candidates to vote for and how to vote on the propositions.  I will vote “No” on 472 and 473, “Yes” on 474. Don’t fall victim to those who insult our intelligence. 

Jeff Kerner